Where the Bow River pathway crosses the lower deck of the Centre St bridge is the most dangerous intersection in the entire pathway system. There is no visibility due to the concrete bridge abutments, and the ped/bike walk/don't-walk light is invisible as you approach the intersection. It becomes visible again only in the last 2 seconds before you enter the intersection - and the don't-walk light lasts only 3 seconds before the cars get a green light. Basically, you could have only 1 second to make up your mind to stop, and 1 more second to do it in. Try that with roller blades!
In the attached video, you can see the walk light during the first 2 seconds. Then it vanishes from view behind a concrete pillar for the next 12 seconds, and only can be seen again at 0:14, barely 2 seconds before I enter the intersection.
Fortunately, the City build a pathway underpass under the bridge to allow users to avoid this dangerous intersection... but they gate that off six months a year!
The official excuse is that they remove some of the metal railings along the underpass during the winter because they *might* be damaged by ice floes in the river, and they don't want to endanger you by having to use an underpass with no railing. Never mind that the railings are on top of a low wall that would prevent you from exiting the underpass... onto a dry gravel-bed, or that 3 out of 4 other bridge underpasses have no railings whatsoever at any time during the year. Isn't nice to know that your personal safety takes a back seat to the City's desire to avoid *possible* damage to a few pieces of metal?
If you object to this, register your displeasure in the comments, or call your City Hall councillor and demand that the underpasses be kept open year round. We don't close the Deerfoot Trail even though the Calf Robe bridge was so poorly designed that it causes frequent crashes in the winter: it's part of the transportation network, and as such must be kept open year-round. Why must pathway users have their underpasses be closed for much less a safety risk? Does Parks fail to understand that these underpasses are part of the transportation network?
Calgary's most dangerous pathway intersection
Submitted by ride on




Not looking
Submitted by wwotl on
I'm glad to see that it's not just me that runners more or less run out in front of without looking... :)
There was an ambulance with its lights flashing at the south side of the Glenmore Dam yesterday. Next to it was a bike that looked rather mangled. There were no people around, so I assume everyone was in the ambulance, but I was wondering whether the cyclist hit the bollard in the middle of the pathway.
bollards
Submitted by ride on
Bollocks to the bollards! On what other roadway in Calgary would it be considered remotely a good idea to place a vertical post in the middle of a driving lane? I'm surprised that the City hasn't been sued yet because of these hazards.
Missing post
Submitted by idontgetit on
I've noticed the post on path by the east end of the zoo is missing. Now there is just the 4" tall socket sticking up in the middle of the path. There was one like this on my commute last winter. Used to scare the heck out of me each morning as I tried to figure out where it was hiding in the snow.
POST
Submitted by Bryanguy on
The post are there to stop bonehead drivers from driving on the path. Believe it or not some people are just that dumb.
I have contacted 311 in
Submitted by SteveK on
I have contacted 311 in regards to this issue.
Quite agree
Submitted by graham on
That it is poorly designed, but I'll bet their response is, you're supposed to *walk* the bike across. Nobody does of course, and its still stupid to close the underpass.