$180 Pants

I've seen this come up on a few other sites/blogs I frequent, and I'm wondering what the feeling is here.

How much would you pay for a pair of pants that you could ride in?

A recent NY Times article about cycle commuting pants has me thinking about what I'm willing to spend on gear. ITTET, is $180 USD + S/H for a pair of Outlier OG pants too much to pay?

For me, it depends on the value [perceived or otherwise] that I get out of it. For example, I used to buy MEC Gore-Tex jackets and pants for snowsports. They offered great fabrics, but bad fit and weird colour combos [red + purple?]. Then I stumbled upon the Patagonia outlet store in Nelson. ["What? This fits, is made from quality fabrics and isn't red + purple? Incroyable!"]

The realization that you get what you pay for spread to other areas, but I still have a hard time thinking that $180 for a set of pants I ride in is a good idea. I have biked around in jeans a couple of times, and they are simply not comfortable. I usually wear a pair of shorts for riding around town, but they aren't really that attractive anymore [400+ wears will do that]. Also, I'd like to not have to worry about changing into something a bit more refined if I decide to ride my bike to a lunch meeting or something.

Then again, I already spend a sizable portion of my income on bike stuff, so why would fancy-pants bother me? What's your limit for stuff like this? Would you hem in your pant expenditure at $50? $100? $300?

Forums: 

multi-use

I try to justify buying gear that can be used for multiple sports and activities - patagonia seems to always fit the bill for me as it is very expensive but a) it lasts forever and b) when it does not it can be replaced free of charge no questions asked. That works for me!

And besides the company has a great environmental record

But hey you are talking to a patagonia snob so.....

I have seen some interesting biking gear over the years and for people who LIVE on a bike some designs are bike-centric and can be useful - cordarounds made these neat pants a hile back with reflectors
http://cordarounds.com/bike-to-work/

so it all depends - however most stuff I find is out of the USA.

Pinkrobe - want to go to the patagonia outlet store in Santa Cruz - maybe a side surfing trip?????

$180 bike pants

Personally I don't have the means to purchase such an expensive pair of pants. But If I were in the saddle for long "training rides" and a competetive cyclist or touring long distances, perhaps they would be a good investment. I get by on my commute in regular short most of the year and sweats with wind pants if its colder out. Ski pants if its frigid, but they can be bulky.

Don't forget we all come from different backgrounds and all make different wages and live different lifestyles. What I consider expensive others may not.

If I had a job where I had to look good, I would pack my clean pants with me, leave them at the office and then I could just change when required.

Lets face it, the sky's the limit when it comes to equiping yourself for biking. If you're willing to spend the $$$$, the stuff is out there for you to spend it on...

It's only money but...

I suppose it's all relative. I've been bike commuting since April 09 and so I save roughly $75 a month by not driving (parking costs and petrol, not sure how to quantify the reduced "wear and tear" on car) I still have the car, goodness knows in Calgary one needs one so I'm not saving any money on no insurance or upkeep etc.

On the other hand, I've spend a chunk of money on some clothes for commuting though I might have spent some of that anyway but for sure, I bought a $250 MEC jacket that I wouldn't have if not for bike commuting. I also paid for an overhaul on my bike and new tires etc.

However, I'm pretty sure that financially I am farther ahead because of the bike commute.

Naturally I don't just do it for the financial gain. Its a quick and dirty way to put some more exercise in my life as well as less traffic stress (for the most part). And I really enjoy it too!

Anyway, I'd buy the pants probably - if it were in the budget that month. You can't really put a price on comfort and convenience. Anything that makes one's life easier is usually worth it.

And they are nice looking pants.

If they did the job.

I'm at a point in my career where cost (within reason) isn't a real big issue. Of more concern to me is whether the pants will do the job. How do they fit? Will they keep me warm? Do they breath? What's the water repellancy with them? How much space do they take up when packed?

The other component is when can I wear them? If they are suitable for cold temperatures and wet cool days as well then they are more purposeful.

I can tell you that it definitely has NOT been a lower cost for me to commute by bicycle. But, I have lost a bit of weight (or kept some off) and my Blood Sugars, when I cycle 3 or 4 times a week to work are better so I know there are health benefits. And, I forgot to mention, I really do like cycling - just not so much in the dark.

So, I'm really doing it more for the exercise and mental benefits (I hate sitting in traffic jams).

does $180 = real value?

IMO - at the end of it all, that is the simple equation that we all default too. as many have mentioned we all have different comfort levels when it comes to spending money and $180 can seem like a lot of money for some, and a drop in the bucket for others.

for me, i would spend that kind of money on a pair of pants if they are great fitting, great looking, and do what they are suppose to do.

i mean, i spent $150 on a blazer yesterday that i will wear very rarely (needed it though). my Chrome backpack cost me $150. the last pair of road racing shoes i bought were $200+ (couple yrs ago).

its all relative.

when i see an adult on a bicycle, i do not despair for the future of the human race.
- h.g. wells

http://critninja.blogspot.com

very dashing!

just for you mike i will post some pics - however, you'll have to wait till next week.

maybe i can also wear it for cycling if calgary ever gets a "tweed ride" going???

when i see an adult on a bicycle, i do not despair for the future of the human race.
- h.g. wells

http://critninja.blogspot.com

I like to consider myself a bit of a ...

NOS (New Old Stock) aficionado. I bought by current road shoes at the end of last year and they were 1-2 seasons in the box and they cost me under $100, not bad for Sidi T1 (carbon soles, my 3rd pair of the same model since 1998. My P2 frame has a similar story. My last 3 new bikes (complwere end of season or 1 year on the shop floor. Great way to save cash.

http://ridecalgary.blogspot.com/

That's like 10 cases of

That's like 10 cases of Steamwhistle WHoo-woo!!! Bar-a-nomics - to justify all purchases ;)

The bicycle is the most civilized conveyance known to man. Other forms of transport grow daily more nightmarish. Only the bicycle remains pure in heart. ~Iris Murdoch, The Red and the Green

interesting

Interesting that these are marketed as cycling pants that can be just used as casual pants. Does that indicate a new direction of North American cycling? My impression is that most people ride in special cycling clothing and then change into normal clothing once they get to their destination. In Europe people mostly wear their normal clothes when riding their bike. Are cycling pants that look like regular pants the first step in the direction of taking cycling out of the "sport" stigma (that some weird people also use for transportation, but still dressed up in their "sport" outfit) into the mainstream? First cycling pants that look like the one Lance Armstrong wears, then cycling pants that look casual, and then casual pants that are also comfortable for cycling?

they look like nice pants

like stylishly cut softshell pants made of Schoeller Dryskin Extreme. That's a great fabric for soft shell stuff and at $180 they are not much more than a pair of MEC pants made from the same stuff (http://www.mec.ca/Products/product_detail.jsp?PRODUCT%3C%3Eprd_id=845524...).
I backcountry ski in softshell pants and have since I first tried a pair - they are much nicer to ski in than goretex pants IMO however I have friends that disagree. Mine are Arc'teryx and are probably worth a couple hundred bucks. I don't have to change them before apres ski at the pub.
I wouldn't get these however, because after a bike commute to work I would change the rest of my outfit so these wouldn't really provide me a benefit.

:)

Those look pretty dang practical, and like all MEC clothing they are made to fit every possible shape of people

practical, maybe

are they made for cycling? meaning, are there seems in the crotch? high back? dropped waist? if not, they are impractical for longer distances.

not to mention stunningly drab.

when i see an adult on a bicycle, i do not despair for the future of the human race.
- h.g. wells

http://critninja.blogspot.com

fit

fit is a pretty key factor for me and MEC brand pants almost never fit me properly. That was kinda my point - there is no question in my mind that soft shell fabrics are great, and for only about $30 more than the MEC pant, if these ones fit better than I would say they are worth the price.

Yes

Yes I would buy them. I think what they do for cyclings' image is unimportant, functional clothing that makes you look like a super model is wicked.

Just on a side note I wonder how well it repels chain grease?

-P

It depends

I keep most of my bike gear specifically as bike gear. Since I'm in the corporate world, I think I'd have a hard time finding something that would fit both needs. While the Outlier pants try to bridge that gap, they're not really corporatey enough for me.

I've bought some pants for winter cycling that were significantly cheaper than "winter cycling pants". I have a pair of cammo hunting pants that wear better and are warmer than my bike pants I bought at a bike store.

I also have some merino sweaters/hoodies that I wear across all kinds of winter activities. They were also cheaper than the "cycling-specific" merino jerseys.

Brand name also comes into play for pricing (obviously) and while it might make a different sometimes, it doesn't always. I have a fleece Pearl Izumi cycling jacket that cost about five times as much as a "no-name" fleece jacket that I think I bought at Costco. I like the cheapy one better...