Bike Calgary directors will be meeting in the near future with Calgary Transit management to discuss the state of bike-transit integration in Calgary. (i.e. bikes on buses and C-Trains). We think it's great that CT is encouraging motorists to leave their cars at home and use their bikes instead, with help from CT to extend their ride at no effort, or get home if the weather turns sour after their ride to work.
The directors have been canvassing cyclists for their opinions, but now we'd like to throw it out to commuters on this forum for your input.
- Have you ever used, or tried to use, the bikes-on-buses program here in Calgary? Have you found the service to be reliable, or are there frequently racks missing from bus routes that should have them?
- If you've used the service, which route(s) have you used? The full list of routes available is here. Is it easy to use the CT website to determine which routes are bike-rack equipped? And, does CT appear to be encouraging cyclists to use this program?
- If you haven't used the bikes on buses program, why not? Is it because there is no equipped bus route near your commute route, or because you prefer to ride actively than passively? Or maybe it's the expense of the bus?
- If you like the idea of bikes on buses, but the existing routes don't suit you, what routes would you like to add to the existing rack-equipped ones?
- And, as for the C-Train, have you ever put your bike on the C-Train? How was the experience? Would you use it more often if the blackout period were reduced? Did you know that you can put up to 2 bikes into the end doors of each car? (so, 4-car trains can carry up to 8 bikes off-hours).
- Have you ever used the bike-lockers that are located at some C-Train stations? What did you like (or not) about that service?
- If you've used a bikes-on-buses program in another city, what was that like? What aspect of that program would you like to see adopted in Calgary?
- And lastly, have you ever carried a folding bike onto a bus, or the C-Train, with it hidden in a bag? Have you gotten any flack over that?
Here's hoping to hear from you in the next week, by February 20th at the latest. And say, if you haven't yet tried to put your bike on a bus or the C-Train, why not give it a try this week and then comment on your experience here?




bikes on c-train
Submitted by critninja on
hey ride
last summer i rode the c-train a couple times from kensington north to the end of the line. my gal and i would ride our cruiser bikes downtown (from silver springs) and after cruising around downtown, princes island, picnic-ing etc we would ride the train back north.
generally i would say we had no problems and really liked having the option of riding the train home - especially after a hard day of cupcake eating, park lounging and wine drinking.
the only issue we came across was that it was very difficult to get onto and off of the train because of the narrow-ness of the train door - and the wider handlebars we have on our bikes. beyond that, the only other thing i'd say is it can be tough to get out of the downtown area if there is a football game on - lots of people riding the train to the game (which is a good thing).
we enjoyed our new-found transportation option so much that we are already planning a few train rides to the south end of the city this summer and will hopefully utilize the train more often.
as a side note - i have a buddy who is a bike courier and during the winter months he would use the train to get home often - but had to wait until after 6pm - which would make for a very long day in the saddle.
With the exception of the
Submitted by ertman on
With the exception of the "blackout" period on c-trains, the program seems to be working fairly well. However, it only works if you already know how to get from point A to point B. If you want to make last minute plans to bike/bus somewhere new, good luck figuring out if it will work. The CT website is mostly useless, and it seems that the operators on the phones don't really know if you'll be able to get your bike on a bus ahead of time. (Other than "that route should have a bike rack...")
It would sure be nice to have an online system that would let you plan your trip by just entering your start and end address, and indicating that you have a bike. (Google Transit anyone?)
transit maps
Submitted by mikewarren on
This is a more-general problem with Calgary transit. Some of the c-train stations have maps now, but a simple map at each bus stop would be waaaay better than the "#121, #156" which most bus stops confront you with now.
I've never taken my bike on the bus, but I have taken on the train a few times which is convenient when it works. That said, some people get very excited (in a negative sense) about bikes on the train...
mike at mike dash warren dot com
Well, Calgary Transit
Submitted by SteveK on
Well, Calgary Transit announced trip planning with Google Maps.
http://www.calgarytransit.com/html/google_transit_pr.html
Unfortunately, the service doesn't provide any information related to bikes on transit.
Steve
The Blackout Period has to go.
Submitted by scwood on
If more people could commute by bike, that would have a pronounced effect on parking & congestion, but few people have the flexibility of starting & ending their work-day outside the blackout periods.
Generally, when I have the opportunity to use the train as part of my trip, people don't have any issues with my bike, but I totally understand that people don't like being on crowded trains with bikes that might get grease on their clothes.
It seems to me that the better solution would be to designate one car of the train (say, the first or last) a "bike-friendly" car and remove the blackout period. A Bike-friendly car could also permit bikes at any door.
If you're wearing Armani (or you just don't like those "cyclists"), don't get on the "Bike" car.
I haven't seen any buses near my place with bike racks on them, so obviously getting more racks on buses would be nice (although I'm only 5 km from the c-train station, maybe that has something to do with it)
Bike on c-train
Submitted by idontgetit on
I took my bike on the c-train once. It was okay, except for trying to leave the station. The only options I could see were trying to squeeze into an elevator or carry the bike up the stairs. I had my panniers loaded so neither option was very good. I'd still do it again if the need comes up. The blackout period could be relaxed a bit too I think.
Canyon meadows?
Submitted by mike runs on
I assume this was at Canyon Meadows station? I'm familiar with most of the rest of the south and northwest stations and I can't think of another one that wouldn't have a level crossing alternative.
Regarding the blackout period, the city could relax it but there's still the practical matter of finding space on the train - unless you're boarding at the end of the line, it can be VERY hard to find space to get on at all, much less with a bike, and changing the rules isn't going to change that fact.
Stairs at C-train stations
Submitted by mercator on
Both Dalhousie and Brentwood stations require you to use the stairs or escalator (if it's working) to exit the platform.
...and university
Submitted by mikewarren on
mike at mike dash warren dot com
You're right
Submitted by mike runs on
I was apparently having a brain cramp when I wrote my post.
I noticed that I can ride to
Submitted by tyler883 on
I noticed that I can ride to and from work faster than Transit can carry me and my bicycle. unless, I'm feeling really lazy, or the road conditions are unsafe, I doubt that I'll use transit.
i bring my bike on the train
Submitted by swak on
i bring my bike on the train quite often.
Only problem i have is that many riders on the train like standing against the wall at the end of each train car, which is where bikes are meant to go.
But i'd start using the bus as well for temporary transit if more buses had racks.
Id be interested in the 4/5 route as well as the 20.
$0.02
Submitted by pinkrobe on
1. Have you ever used, or tried to use, the bikes-on-buses program here in Calgary? Have you found the service to be reliable, or are there frequently racks missing from bus routes that should have them?
Never used it. In fact, I rarely see buses with racks.
2. If you've used the service, which route(s) have you used? The full list of routes available is here. Is it easy to use the CT website to determine which routes are bike-rack equipped? And, does CT appear to be encouraging cyclists to use this program?
n/a
3. If you haven't used the bikes on buses program, why not? Is it because there is no equipped bus route near your commute route, or because you prefer to ride actively than passively? Or maybe it's the expense of the bus?
The bus routes near me are slower than simply riding my bike to almost any destination I can think of. I have no need for the bus-bike program as I have no need for the bus.
4. If you like the idea of bikes on buses, but the existing routes don't suit you, what routes would you like to add to the existing rack-equipped ones?
n/a
5. And, as for the C-Train, have you ever put your bike on the C-Train? How was the experience? Would you use it more often if the blackout period were reduced? Did you know that you can put up to 2 bikes into the end doors of each car? (so, 4-car trains can carry up to 8 bikes off-hours).
I last used the train to transport my bike >10 years ago. It worked well enough, but the restrictions on peak use made it a non-starter for commuting. If I had to travel through the downtown core [i.e. Brentwood to Fish Creek], it would be significantly faster to go by bike only.
6. Have you ever used the bike-lockers that are located at some C-Train stations? What did you like (or not) about that service?
n/a
7. If you've used a bikes-on-buses program in another city, what was that like? What aspect of that program would you like to see adopted in Calgary?
n/a
8. And lastly, have you ever carried a folding bike onto a bus, or the C-Train, with it hidden in a bag? Have you gotten any flack over that?
n/a
HHCMF!!!
Google Transit now available for Calgary
Submitted by ride on
While we're on the topic of bikes and public transit, Google has released an update for its Google Transit application, and now includes Calgary. I promptly checked out what it would say about the bus I should take from my home in Bridgeland to my office in downtown Calgary. Here's the Google Transit suggestion:
Yes, Google tells me I should ignore the No. 9 bus stop right in front of my home, and instead walk half way to my office before getting on a No. 4 bus on Edmonton Trail. The No. 9 also happens to stop just one block from my office, so I'm not sure why Google would ignore this route. Looks like there will be some growing pains in that application.
In the meanwhile, the schedules and route maps on the Calgary Transit website have recently been much improved, so you may want to stick with that source for your transit information.
But, "wait!", you say. "Google Transit also shows walking directions (and in some cities, biking directions)". True enough. But look at the suggested walking route for the same trip:
Google Transit is suggesting that you walk across the ugly, multi-lane 5th Ave flyover bridge with its significant elevation gain and loss, rather than the more direct, level, and pedestrian-friendly Langevin Bridge. Looks like the application needs to incorporate local knowledge. I can hardly wait for their bike-route suggestions (not!).
Bikes on transit
Submitted by PedalFaster on
1. Have you ever used, or tried to use, the bikes-on-buses program here in Calgary? Have you found the service to be reliable, or are there frequently racks missing from bus routes that should have them?
Never have used a bus bike rack, have hardly used the bus. I am stupid when it comes to schedules and just don't find Calgary Transit bus system to be useful when compared with cycling, walking, or driving. Can't say I have given it a try recently though.
2. If you've used the service, which route(s) have you used? The full list of routes available is here. Is it easy to use the CT website to determine which routes are bike-rack equipped? And, does CT appear to be encouraging cyclists to use this program?
n/a
3. If you haven't used the bikes on buses program, why not? Is it because there is no equipped bus route near your commute route, or because you prefer to ride actively than passively? Or maybe it's the expense of the bus?
A combination of scheduling, route planning and cost of taking the bus. In general I can get to any destination within 10km faster, easier, and cheaper on my bike than by using the bus in almost any kind of weather or situation. For distances greater than 10km or when I need to carry lots of stuff I would drive. I gave Calgary buses a try when I first came here in '97 but quickly found that cycling and c-train was much easier. Haven't given the bus system a good try lately.
4. If you like the idea of bikes on buses, but the existing routes don't suit you, what routes would you like to add to the existing rack-equipped ones?
n/a
5. And, as for the C-Train, have you ever put your bike on the C-Train? How was the experience? Would you use it more often if the blackout period were reduced? Did you know that you can put up to 2 bikes into the end doors of each car? (so, 4-car trains can carry up to 8 bikes off-hours).
Yes. I used to commute from Westbrook to the airport each day. On the way there I would ride downtown and hop on the c-train at the west end of downtown and take it all the way to Whitehorn, then ride from there to the airport. One way trip took about 45 minutes. I was lucky that my start time was rarely during the blackout times at rush hour. On the way home I would usually ride the whole way, or else take the same c-train route in reverse.
Occasionally use the c-train if going far along the line with my bike, might as well get a ride some of the way. Have used the Zoo station as a starting point often both by bike and as a staging point for the car.
I think the blackout period is important for safety reasons, and also for the convenience and efficient movement of the majority of users during rush hour periods. There are blackout times on most major transit systems during rush hour. For an experiment though perhaps the end door of the last car (only) on a train could be designated a bicycle zone at all times of day. This means cyclists would get on last, but get off first and hopefully get out of the way of the crowds during busy times. Access for bicycles is still limited during the blackout giving preference to the main body of users (pedestrians) but also the option is there for those who would really find it useful.
6. Have you ever used the bike-lockers that are located at some C-Train stations? What did you like (or not) about that service?
No.
But large public bike lock ups should be encouraged at many places, transit hubs, malls, downtown. Theft can be a problem but if you don't ride a particularly expensive bike then you are not at much risk. (I'm sure someone will want to debate this) There are free and extremely cheap bikes everywhere, even in our city. People steal expensive bikes and expensive and easy to remove parts because they can sell them easily. People rarely need to steal a bike just to get something to ride, especially if it is locked securely. Sturdy, comfortable and fairly cheap bikes are perfect for a short ride to the train station or store where they will be locked up for long periods in public.
7. If you've used a bikes-on-buses program in another city, what was that like? What aspect of that program would you like to see adopted in Calgary?
Have experience using the TTC (Toronto transit) and their system is much easier to use, although there are a lot more people. There are blackout periods during rush hours, but otherwise you can take your bike on trains and buses. For years you were allowed to use the rear door of the bus for boarding as the buses then had a huge standing room area at the rear. Now they have moved to the bike rack system. Subway travel is more difficult because it is almost all underground so you have to carry your bike up and down stairs a lot. However the train goes a long way very quickly so combined with a bike your traveling power is huge, and street level transit is very frequent for transfers and connections.
8. And lastly, have you ever carried a folding bike onto a bus, or the C-Train, with it hidden in a bag? Have you gotten any flack over that?
No.
But a big backpack or a full tool belt get their fair share of frowns.
I rarely take my bike on
Submitted by 2wheeler on
I rarely take my bike on transit, but it sometimes comes in handy in the winter night commutes. I've never used the bikes on buses facilities and have no idea how well it would work. I'd really rather ride than ride the bus. Blackout periods do make it hard to use for commuting to a regular job. I've used the C train at night from the U of C and in quiet times it worked well. I've never used the bike lockers, and didn't know they were available.
1. Have you ever used, or
Submitted by kat on
1. Have you ever used, or tried to use, the bikes-on-buses program here in Calgary?
Never tried. I live close to the #1 bus route so keep watching for a bus on a bike but I've never seen one. I don't really feel comfortable asking a bus driver to show me how to load a bike onto the rack or wait while I do it.
5. And, as for the C-Train, have you ever put your bike on the C-Train? How was the experience?
When I was starting to ride I took my bike on the train quite often. I had a job at the UofC for a year so would bike to the Hillhurst/Sunnyside station then jump on the train up to the Banff Trail station. It was a great way to avoid the hill.
I'm hoping to start taking my bike on the train again later this spring. One of my current jobs is down in the SW and I work until 9 pm so I'm thinking about biking to work, then biking to the train after work.
how to put bike on bus-rack
Submitted by ride on
Cool. Thanks for that.
Submitted by kat on
Cool. Thanks for that.
folding bikes on the train
Submitted by ride on
One commuter I know has a Dahon 20" folding bike (which locally are sold at Bow Cycle). He has been using C-Train quite regularly with it, even during the blackout period. I asked him whether he puts it in a bag and he said 'no', he just folded it. He said that CT seemed to accept this, as he hasn't been hassled. Of course, it could just be that the people looking at the surveillance cameras don't perceive that the object he is carrying is a bike. He did opine however that simply taking the front wheel off your regular 26"-wheel bike doesn't make it a folding bike
, which I took to mean that it was noticed by CT.
I know from my own experience that CT does pay attention to their surveillance cameras: one time I got on my bike at one end of a platform in order to ride to the other end, and within just a few seconds there was a loud voice on the speaker system telling me to get off the bike.
I've taken a folding bike on the train a few times, but not yet during the blackout period. The fact that the pedals fold in, and the handlebars too, makes it easier to get through the narrow doorways on the older train cars. (Note to designers: what were you thinking? The purpose of doors is to facilitate entry or exit, and yet the design of the doors on the older cars is such as to impede entry and exit. Another case of designers not eating their own dog-food).
my bike-on-bus experience
Submitted by ride on
1. Have you ever used, or tried to use, the bikes-on-buses program here in Calgary? Have you found the service to be reliable, or are there frequently racks missing from bus routes that should have them?
I've tried twice to use the racks-on-buses program. Each time it was to go from Bowness to downtown, using the No.1 bus route. And each time, when the bus came there was no rack on it! One of the times I had waited nearly half an hour (it was a weekend) for the bus, so I was pissed. I asked the driver if I could just bring the bike onto the completely empty bus and his reply was "that isn't safe for the other passengers, sir". I told him that if any passengers got on and I was causing a problem for him I'd get off right away, but he refused. To his credit he did radio to Dispatch for instructions, though.
One other time a colleague wanted to use the same bus route, to go from Inglewood to Parkdale. After waiting 10 min for the bus, he found that it too arrived with no rack.
How many customers would an airline have if it didn't bother to show up with an airplane at the scheduled time? Or the plane did show up, but passengers were told "Sorry, you're out of luck, we've decided we're only carrying cargo this time".
CT's reliability seems to be abysmally poor. Many times I notice No.1 buses with no rack. Other times, I notice buses from other non-eligible routes with racks. This indicates to me that the Dispatches couldn't be bothered to get the rack-equipped buses onto the routes that are supposed to have them. And since the buses with the racks are servicing routes that aren't supposed to have racks, of course no cyclist will be there waiting to use those racks. It's as though CT is deliberately sabotaging the program so that when politicians ask to expand it, they can say "but no one ever uses it anyway".
2. If you've used the service, which route(s) have you used? The full list of routes available is here. Is it easy to use the CT website to determine which routes are bike-rack equipped? And, does CT appear to be encouraging cyclists to use this program?
CT's bikes-on-buses page is not very encouraging to cyclists. For instance, there's no description of how to use the bike racks. Other transit companies providing text, picture or even video descriptions on this. CT's web page seems to be all about blackout periods and confiscating your bike to give to police (it's the biggest text on the page).
3. If you haven't used the bikes on buses program, why not? Is it because there is no equipped bus route near your commute route, or because you prefer to ride actively than passively? Or maybe it's the expense of the bus?
Well, there are few bus routes that have bike racks. And of those, only a couple actually go anywhere that's helpful to bike commuters. No. 1 is a good cross-town route, but it parallels the river pathway system, which is nice to ride on. No.6 and 7 climb up the big hill out of downtown into South Calgary, so that might be useful to a cyclist (I've actually seen a bike on a No. 7 bus).
But virtually all of the other routes with bike racks are routes that travel from far-off southern suburbs to C-Train stations. Why would anyone put a bike on one of those buses? What, to take it to a place where it can be vandalized? A sceptic would conclude that those routes were chosen so that the ads on the front of the buses could be seen by as many suburban shoppers as possible.
4. If you like the idea of bikes on buses, but the existing routes don't suit you, what routes would you like to add to the existing rack-equipped ones?
I think that one logical route to include would be the No. 3, because it parallels the southern C-Train route. This would allow cycle commuters to avoid the blackout period on the train. And in the north, the No. 3 route serves an area where there is no train?
Since some commuters have mentioned on this site that they don't use the bike racks because it's no faster than just riding the bike along the same route (witness the leap-frogging with the bus that inevitably happens when you ride along a bus route), it would be great to see bike racks on the faster BRT buses (Bike Rapid Transit
.
5. And, as for the C-Train, have you ever put your bike on the C-Train? How was the experience? Would you use it more often if the blackout period were reduced? Did you know that you can put up to 2 bikes into the end doors of each car? (so, 4-car trains can carry up to 8 bikes off-hours).
I've used the C-Train plenty of times. Normally I'm using it outside of busy times, and I haven't been hassled by anyone. I carry a little strap to hold the bike against the back wall of the car so it doesn't fall over. Putting the bike on the train allows me to extend my reach. Like one other commuter mentioned, I've used mine to get to the airport and back in a lunch hour from downtown (well okay, on the return leg I tried riding on Deerfoot Trail, but that's another story). Another time recently I used the train to get me part of the way so I could ride to Okotoks. And one evening I used it to go from downtown out to Crowfoot and back (I got off at Dalhousie and rode the rest of the way).
The blackout period is a problem for cycle commuters, no question. On the other hand the design of the older cars is such that it's difficult to get a bike on an off the train when it's full of people. And all those people are paying customers. On the other hand, even during rush hour, the trains heading away from downtown are often only lightly populated. So I think CT could look at a narrower, or no, restriction in that direction.
6. Have you ever used the bike-lockers that are located at some C-Train stations? What did you like (or not) about that service?
I've never used the CT lockers. You can only use them if you pay six months in advance. That is not customer-focused at all! There needs to be safe bike parking available by the day, just like for motorists.
7. If you've used a bikes-on-buses program in another city, what was that like? What aspect of that program would you like to see adopted in Calgary?
I've used the streetcar system in Portland, Oregon. The cars have great big doors that open outside the car, making it super easy to carry a bike onto the car. And they provide hooks to hang your bike up so you don't have to hold it. And I've also used the Sky Train in Vancouver. Again, big wide doors make entry and exit easy.
Speaking of Vancouver, their Trans Link is currently studying a bike rental program for all their stations. Wow, what a concept! Make it easy for cyclists to use our train system. And as for the buses, virtually all buses in the Vancouver area have bike racks now. You don't have to guess which routes might have racks. And if all routes have racks, there's little chance of them causing a problem for cyclists by switching buses from one route to another.
8. And lastly, have you ever carried a folding bike onto a bus, or the C-Train, with it hidden in a bag? Have you gotten any flack over that?
See my other post on this subject. Yes, I've done it a few times. I see this as a great way for cycle commuters to avoid the blackout period on the train. Just buy a cheap folding bike ($400 or less), throw it in a hockey bag, and no one's the wiser. It sure would be great, though, if Calgary Transit actively promoted this option as a workaround for its blackout period.
folding bikes on c-trains
Submitted by umgray on
I have had great experiences with taking my folding Dahon on c-trains even during blackout (a majority of time when I commute to work). However, some rules that I obey are:
1) Wait for the right train - yes I actually wait - and there are times that two to three trains pass packed to the gills but I guess that Southland station does get the odd less crowded train. I never go on with my folder if the train is packed.
2) I will pick the newer trains over the older ones. - The newer train cars have these great spots for folding bikes. Since the doors slide out and not accordion in as is the case for the old ones, I place my wheel right between the pole and the door and voila myself and the bike take up the same room as a person with a briefcase. If I have to take a older train I tend to migrate to the centre "circle" between two cars where there is more room.
3) My folding bike becomes a conversation piece. There are countless times I have had conversations about my folder and how it works, I swear I must have sold a few in the process. It's a great feeling advocating bicycle commuting.
4) Always be aware of the bicycle and its location in relation to train becoming crowded, peoples movement and their ability to NOT look where they are going - it suck to have to be the one always alert but since I am the one technically not allowed on the train with my folder during peak hours I have to be extra courteous.
I have had great conversations with Transit on folding bikes and c-trains. So far they are interested in changing the by-laws, however I caution all off you. Folding bikes needs to be defined as they have in other cities around the world. They will no doubt be required to be "bagged" and if allowed we will still have to be diligent towards the needs of our fellow passengers. It's funny, London underground allows folders on the tube which was hailed as a great accomplishment and it worked fine up until the bicycle commuters began getting lazy and were not folding their bikes on the platforms and blocking entry and exits with their bikes. In the end they had to have this awareness campaign about the responsibility bike/train commuters had when boarding the trains.
Busses have never been a problem.
Happy folding. see you on the trains!
Poor marketing of bike-racks program
Submitted by ride on
How successful would a business be if its sales staff routinely ignored, badgered, argued with, harassed, or even assaulted the customers that came in the door?
Calgary Transit is trying to encourage cyclists to use its bike-racks-on-buses program, and yet its "sales staff", the drivers, are apparently not infrequently making life difficult for cyclists.
Today I met a bike courier who was still shaking with the after-effects of an encounter with a bus driver an hour earlier. He was riding south on 8 St SW under the railway tracks into Beltline, when the driver of a BRT articulated bus zoomed past him in the left lane. The courier was taking the right lane, as he should, since those lanes are too narrow to accommodate a car and a bike. Buses are so wide that they take up more than one lane. The courier told me that as driver passed him, he pulled back into the right lane before the 2nd half of his bus had cleared the cyclist. As a result, he brushed up against the cyclist and forced him toward the wall.
At this point I should mention that this particular courier is widely regarded as one of the strongest and most skilled in the city. He told me that he can take this stuff, but he was worried at what might have happened to a new rider. It's not clear that the bus driver even knew what he had done. However, up a couple of blocks and around a corner, the bus driver was waiting for the cyclist and actually got out of his bus and accosted him.
So here is a professionally-trained public employee apparently driving with reckless abandon and acting with aggression against cyclists. Maybe this is a one-off case, though, you say. Maybe the courier provoked the driver in some way. Maybe the situation didn't happen just as I've described it. These are all possibilities. I'm not a judge or a police investigator; I'm just telling a story as told to me, and raising a thought for your consideration.
I later called around, trying to track down the courier to get additional information for my registered complaint with CT, since I didn't have a current number for him. I called a couple of other couriers, and just said "I need his number since he was in a conflict with a CT driver". To my surprise, every courier (without me asking) offered several stories of aggression by CT drivers. Since couriers are on the road all the time, it's inevitable that they'll run across aggressive drivers, and it seems they're able to just shrug that off as part of the job. And yet all the couriers I talked to commented on incidents of CT drivers acting in unhelpful ways (like honking at cyclists for being in the Centre St. HOV lane - note to drivers: just check the signs and you'll see they're allowed, indeed required, to ride in that lane), or cutting them off.
So if couriers are being harassed by CT drivers, I wonder if the general cycle-commuting population is also getting the same treatment, or whether couriers in particular get picked on.
On the one hand, we have CT supposedly wanting cyclists to use the bike racks, and on the other hand, we have cyclists apparently reluctant to use a service that is provided by drivers that seem at best to be indifferent to cyclists and at worst to be actively hostile to them. Is it possible that one of the reasons that the bike-racks program is not a resounding success is the attitude of the people providing the service?
So, what is your experience with CT drivers? Are they generally courteous to you as a cycle commuter? Are the bad ones few and far between? Or is there enough of a problem that we should be actively trying to get some bike-awareness training for the drivers? After all, they're driving some of the biggest and heaviest vehicles on the road, and we're driving the smallest and lightest vehicles. A mistake by a bus driver is an inconvenience to him/her. That same mistake could have fatal consequences for us. Does that inequity in size make cyclists more likely to feel attacked by bus drivers than by drivers of smaller vehicles?
It's probably my fault...
Submitted by mercator on
I once had a flat right at an empty bus stop, so I used the convenient bench to hold my bike up while I did my repairs. After the second bus stopped for me, I realized I was just giving the drivers another reason to dislike bikes.
Sorry 'bout that.
CT bullies
Submitted by wwotl on
I definitely think some CT drivers make a point of being deliberately aggressive towards cyclists. Not all of them, but certainly a good number of them -- most recently the driver of the shuttle bus that was following me along the road about 2 feet away from my rear wheel...
I've experienced it many times, I've heard it from others and I've seen it happen to other cyclists plenty of times, too.
I can understand that driving a huge bus requires a lot of attention and that sometimes the driver really doesn't see the cyclist. But I've also seen/experienced the "dare to ^&)&*^ with me" stare from CT drivers who you know, without a doubt, just cut you off or shoved you into the oncoming traffic lane knowingly and deliberately.
I've also been a passenger on a bus when a CT driver hit a pedestrian who was crossing in a wide, open crosswalk. The CT driver was busy unwrapping a Twinkie as he was turning, and the person he hit ended up dying because of it. This incident certainly wasn't an act of aggression, but it illustrates the point that it only takes one second for something to happen, and against a bus you're going to lose.
A bus driver turning or driving too close to a cyclist is not going to be able to stop or swerve suddenly the same way they might be able to in their car. And, not only are they endangering the cyclist, but also all passengers on the bus - possibly physically and emotionally. I guarantee I'll never forget the scene after the driver hit the pedestrian in the crosswalk, and I'm sure none of the other passengers or witnesses ever will, either.
witness
Submitted by ride on
So, what happened to that Twinkie-loving, ped-crushing CT driver?
Who knows?
Submitted by wwotl on
I don't know -- I learned the pedestrian died when I was reading the paper the next day or two after the accident but don't remember what it said about the driver, if anything.
I'm not sure what happens when a CT driver is involved in a serious accident or a fatality. I also imagine the laws are somewhat different if you're protected as a member of a union... Regardless, I imagine you'd be pretty messed up emotionally and mentally and certainly not fit for work for some time, if ever again.
However, if there's an accident that results in an injury or fatality and witnesses prove that there was aggression behind it (which wasn't the case in this accident) the driver should be charged with murder.
I hope that detail was shared...
Submitted by NW_Tri_and_Bike on
...he deserves to be fired and get "his" behind bars.
http://ridecalgary.blogspot.com/
Rush hour madness
Submitted by Danimal on
As a messenger that commutes daily up and down center street hill for the last 3 yrs Ive had my fare share of encounters with rush hour gone mad bus drivers. I have been squeezed to the side of that extra large lane many a times by, cars that shouldnt even be in the lane during 330- 6, but almost always by buses. The favorite approach by them is to pass a cyclist half way and then pull over forcing us to slow right down or be assaulted by a bus. I ride too fast for the pathways, and apparently too slow for the roads (even though I end up passing every vehicle by 16ave north cause they are sruck stressing in rush hour traffic) so I am going to stick to the roads cause thats where bicycles belong.
One other repetitive problem I have experienced on the road in Calgary is; when waiting at a red light(yes messengers do this when theres nothin hot in thier bag) I am required to be on the right side in the right hand lane, which is the bus lane. If a bus comes from behind it tries to pull as close as it can to beside or behind, and then either lays on the horn or passes like a madman yelling to get off the road or something equally intelligent. If you were to start with the bus at a red light there would be no room to pull up on the right cause they dont leave it. If everyone on the road just drove where they were going and not try to correct others small mistakes there would be less hostility and I more room on the road for cyclists.
Wondering what happened
Submitted by jondub on
I was wondering what happened as a result of the meeting, if anything.
I have rented a bike locker at the new Crowfoot LRT, for $132 per year it seems like good value, although I hardly used it during the summer. It is much quicker to ride to the LRT from Tuscany compared to the feeder bus, so I expect that I will use it more in the winter.
It is interesting to note that the journey time from the far NW by bike and train is still longer than by biking all the way.
Ironically I was just ranting about this subject this morning
Submitted by Scott on
I lived for a year on Heritage drive and when my car broke down I was forced to rely on transit at the time. The time of year was winter and I had my daughter most of the time so relied on the transit. I needed to take a bus to the train and then another bus to Deer Run. On weekends, when I finished work, the transit had stopped so I would be forced to walk to the train and then after the train, walk home. In sub zero temps this was painful. I would be off work at 9:30 and get home at midnight often and sometimes with mild hypothermia setting in. Hard to expose a child to that. Many of those days I would loved to have had my bike but there was never a bike rack. Ever. Since that day, I have been looking at bus's all the time and to this day have yet to see a bike rack on one. I know they are there but I havent seen one. Just how many are there? I think there should be one on EVERY bus rolling personally. It puts more money in CT's bank instead of the gas stations.
Bottom line... an extra train car for cyclists only should exist. A rack on EVERY bus should exist. This takes care of prime time problems not allowing bikes on the trains also. Its done in many countries where they remove seating in one car and its for cyclists only. Anybody found in that car without a bike gets fined. Simple as that.
http://scottewing.wordpress.com/ My Bohemia Blog
CT Bikes on Buses
Submitted by ebazile on
Ebazile
I never use the bike racks on buses but would like to have the option of using one if the weather turns. Not enough routes are equipped w/racks in this city. If more were available, I'd use them.
What I'd really like to see is more access to CTrains for cyclists. It'd be nice to have the option of taking my bike on the CTrain during peak periods. Transit systems in Europe provide seatless cars for bikes!
Someday Calgary might catch up!!!
transit & bike
Submitted by Robert Bott on
1. Have you ever used, or tried to use, the bikes-on-buses program here in Calgary? Have you found the service to be reliable, or are there frequently racks missing from bus routes that should have them?
I haven't used bikes-on-buses here, but I have in other cities. Because of the front rack on my touring bike, the arm to secure the wheel did not rotate far enough to properly secure the bike, so I had to use a bungee cord to secure the bike adequately. The first time this occurred, fortunately the driver was patient. So it's important to anticipate any such situations due to unusual gear, tire size, etc. Very good idea in principle, though I don't actually see many bikes on buses in Calgary.
2. n/a
3. If you haven't used the bikes on buses program, why not? Is it because there is no equipped bus route near your commute route, or because you prefer to ride actively than passively? Or maybe it's the expense of the bus?
The need has not arisen to date. The C-Train generally gets me close enough to places I can't reach directly by cycling. Buses usually get close enough to start and end points that thus far it's been simpler to walk.
4. n/a
5. And, as for the C-Train, have you ever put your bike on the C-Train? How was the experience? Would you use it more often if the blackout period were reduced? Did you know that you can put up to 2 bikes into the end doors of each car? (so, 4-car trains can carry up to 8 bikes off-hours).
I probably take the bike on the C-Train once or twice a month on average. I would do so more often if the afternoon blackout began at 4 instead of 3.
6. Have you ever used the bike-lockers that are located at some C-Train stations? What did you like (or not) about that service?
No.
7. If you've used a bikes-on-buses program in another city, what was that like? What aspect of that program would you like to see adopted in Calgary?
See my answer to 1 above. As near as I can tell, all the Bay Area buses have racks, and this simplifies planning if you always know you'll be able to find one. They seemed to be well used.
8. And lastly, have you ever carried a folding bike onto a bus, or the C-Train, with it hidden in a bag? Have you gotten any flack over that?
No.
C-Train
Submitted by NW_Tri_and_Bike on
I have taken my bike there late in the evening twice and on the weekends many times. What I dislike is the demand that you must stand at the end of the train. On the surface it seems like something that is reasonable unit you try to fit a bike trailer through the end doors. You might be able to fit a Chariot single (one of the higher end models) thriugh the end door, no doubles for sure, Croozer/Mec singles won't fit either (I own a MEC single for the time being). I would like to see one car with the seats removed from the middle to one end or the other (about 60% of the space) as a pilot project this summer to encourage more multi modal travel. I would use the bike locker program if I worked downtown but since I don't ... I won't be trying it for now.
http://ridecalgary.blogspot.com/