I just got issued a Summons under Municipal Bylaw 52M87 section 6 (3) 'Bike not on Rack' while stopping off at Caffe Rosso (across from the Glenbow Museum) to grab a cup of coffee. I'm all for keeping society safe - but my bike was leaning up against a wall. Tax money being squandered away... why not just inform me of the bylaw and educate me? My court hearing is May 16th.
If you look at 3. (1) "Those portions of Stephen (8th) Avenue South in the City which lie between: (a) The West boundary of First Street East and the East boundary of Centre Street South; and (b) The West boundary of Centre Street South and the East boundary of First Street West; and (c) The West boundary of First Street West and the East boundary of Second Street West; and (d) The West boundary of Second Street West and the East boundary of Third Street West; are hereby established as the Mall"
From that, you were not parked in the "mall" area as you were on First Street between Eigth and Ninth.
Also, I can't remember, but is there signs that state you are in the mall area? If they are going to enforce this shouldn't there be signs for a boundary?
You're right Bob, 8 avenue between Macleod Trail and 1 st SE is not part of the mall. You are allowed to ride your bike there. dtail, don't pay the fine. Show up at the courthouse and tell them to waive it. This is just ridiculous.
I notice that the bylaw is 25 years old. Time for a change? Also, what's up with 6.(2):
Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Bylaw the following activities are prohibited on the Mall: skateboarding, roller skating, the riding of bicycles, the throwing of projectiles of any nature or kind, and the feeding of birds on the Mall.
Surely bicycles are permitted after 6pm, when even cars are allowed?
I went down there today to check the signage, and cars and bike riding are allowed from 6 pm to 6 am, according to the sign, but not the bylaw?
Also weird - if you go check it out on google streetview, they have blurred out that sign, but only the specific part about bike riding! I've sat here for half an hour trying to figure that out, I assume it has something to do with Google's lawyers, but I can't think of a reason to do that! Anybody have a good guess?
I looked on google, and unfortuneately there is a bike rack right across from the A&W. I was thinking that you might be able to argue that "There are no [redacted] Bike Racks!!" But such is not the case.
Was it a police officer or a bylaw officer? Did you ask him/her if they had anything better to do?
You know that old saying "ignorance of the law is no excuse?" "It's easy to be ignorant of the law when you would never expect 3 city blocks to have their own special bylaw.
I think the city should have put up signs saying "bikes must use bike racks provided. My reasoning is that they put up signs telling you not to skateboard or ride your bike etc. which is in the bylaw, so why don't they put the bike rack requirement on the sign as well?
I think this is definitely worth a shot. A lot of people driving cars get off parking infractions when there is insufficient signage, so why not the same for parking bikes? I bet there could be a judge out there sympathetic to that logic, particularly if you admit fault and take responsibility and ask for leniency since it was almost impossible for you to have known about this old, bizarre little bylaw.
Is it really not an excuse? How many thousands of laws and bylaws are there in effect right now in Calgary (try asking the judge, I bet they don't know either). You could try saying it's simply unreasonable not to be able to lean your bike up against a wall...
Please for give mine (ignorance)... But how does one become legally responsible for such fines? There is no bicycle registration, and if you are not carrying ID, how to they know who to give the summons to? I understand a responsible citizen should and would give their correct identity when asked by By-Law, but I can't help but think, if they tried to give me a summons for something as ridiculous as that, I would refuse. Then again, if I were actually in the situation, I probably would be compliant. Just curious more than anything else?
Thanks for all the responses - I'm in the process of posting something more detailed up on tumblr... along with an awareness strategy. I'll fire off that link once ready - but your participation will be appreciated! The maximum fine is $200 - which I would happily pay if I can generate enough awareness on the absurdity of this situation. Details to follow.
A few more details for you: There was no signage. It was directly across from the Glenbow Museum on Stephen Ave. I'm not a courier but I sure looked like one on that day. It was a police officer not a bylaw officer. My court date is May 16 but that's for me to plead 'not guilty' - then a trial date will be set.
not helpful
Submitted by 2wheeler on
use a bike rack next time?
I wasn't aware of this bylaw either. I've often used the patio fences to lock up my bike.
Doesn't seem like part of the mall
Submitted by BowCycle on
Hey Dave,
If you look at 3. (1) "Those portions of Stephen (8th) Avenue South in the City which lie
between: (a) The West boundary of First Street East and the East boundary of
Centre Street South; and (b) The West boundary of Centre Street South and the East boundary
of First Street West; and (c) The West boundary of First Street West and the East boundary of
Second Street West; and (d) The West boundary of Second Street West and the East boundary
of Third Street West; are hereby established as the Mall"
From that, you were not parked in the "mall" area as you were on First Street between Eigth and Ninth.
Also, I can't remember, but is there signs that state you are in the mall area? If they are going to enforce this shouldn't there be signs for a boundary?
Bob
You're right Bob, 8 avenue
Submitted by fixmtl on
You're right Bob, 8 avenue between Macleod Trail and 1 st SE is not part of the mall. You are allowed to ride your bike there. dtail, don't pay the fine. Show up at the courthouse and tell them to waive it. This is just ridiculous.
If I understand it right, he
Submitted by Richard Z on
If I understand it right, he was on 8 Ave between Centre and 1 St.
I was thinking of Deville
Submitted by BowCycle on
My bad.
Ridculous
Submitted by Richard Z on
What's the fine? 50$?
I notice that the bylaw is 25 years old. Time for a change? Also, what's up with 6.(2):
Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Bylaw the following activities are prohibited on the Mall: skateboarding, roller skating, the riding of bicycles, the throwing of projectiles of any nature or kind, and the feeding of birds on the Mall.
Surely bicycles are permitted after 6pm, when even cars are allowed?
Did you get the summons from police or bylaw?
The weird thing is ....
Submitted by gyrospanner on
I went down there today to check the signage, and cars and bike riding are allowed from 6 pm to 6 am, according to the sign, but not the bylaw?
Also weird - if you go check it out on google streetview, they have blurred out that sign, but only the specific part about bike riding! I've sat here for half an hour trying to figure that out, I assume it has something to do with Google's lawyers, but I can't think of a reason to do that! Anybody have a good guess?
Conspiracy Theory?
talk to the CDA
Submitted by umgray on
Talk to the CDA and explain the situation and ask if that in fact is their jurisdiction and if they know there is a "crack-down" on this?
They might be willing to help.
I'm really enjoying the responses on Beyond
Submitted by Cword on
The thread you generated there is mmuch more entertaining.
This made coffee come out my nose

$50 OH CRAP!
Submitted by gyrospanner on
I looked on google, and unfortuneately there is a bike rack right across from the A&W. I was thinking that you might be able to argue that "There are no [redacted] Bike Racks!!" But such is not the case.
Was it a police officer or a bylaw officer? Did you ask him/her if they had anything better to do?
I have a suggestion
Submitted by gyrospanner on
You know that old saying "ignorance of the law is no excuse?" "It's easy to be ignorant of the law when you would never expect 3 city blocks to have their own special bylaw.
I think the city should have put up signs saying "bikes must use bike racks provided. My reasoning is that they put up signs telling you not to skateboard or ride your bike etc. which is in the bylaw, so why don't they put the bike rack requirement on the sign as well?
Good Luck
Worth a shot
Submitted by DarrenB on
I think this is definitely worth a shot. A lot of people driving cars get off parking infractions when there is insufficient signage, so why not the same for parking bikes? I bet there could be a judge out there sympathetic to that logic, particularly if you admit fault and take responsibility and ask for leniency since it was almost impossible for you to have known about this old, bizarre little bylaw.
ignorance
Submitted by mikewarren on
Is it really not an excuse? How many thousands of laws and bylaws are there in effect right now in Calgary (try asking the judge, I bet they don't know either). You could try saying it's simply unreasonable not to be able to lean your bike up against a wall...
And please let us know how it goes!
Submitted by gyrospanner on
Cheers!
ignorance?
Submitted by christophish on
Please for give mine (ignorance)... But how does one become legally responsible for such fines? There is no bicycle registration, and if you are not carrying ID, how to they know who to give the summons to? I understand a responsible citizen should and would give their correct identity when asked by By-Law, but I can't help but think, if they tried to give me a summons for something as ridiculous as that, I would refuse. Then again, if I were actually in the situation, I probably would be compliant. Just curious more than anything else?
Awareness is my strategy
Submitted by dtail on
Thanks for all the responses - I'm in the process of posting something more detailed up on tumblr... along with an awareness strategy. I'll fire off that link once ready - but your participation will be appreciated! The maximum fine is $200 - which I would happily pay if I can generate enough awareness on the absurdity of this situation. Details to follow.
A few more details for you: There was no signage. It was directly across from the Glenbow Museum on Stephen Ave. I'm not a courier but I sure looked like one on that day. It was a police officer not a bylaw officer. My court date is May 16 but that's for me to plead 'not guilty' - then a trial date will be set.
Viva los bicicletas libre!
- Dave
Good luck!
Submitted by fixmtl on
And keep us posted!
They dropped my summons... of course
Submitted by dtail on
Summons dropped upon presenting myself at the window. A bit anti climatic.. but I guess common sense kicked in. :nut:
I was sure to lean my bike up against the courthouse wall along side my brethren. ;)
You Win!
Submitted by gyrospanner on
Did they give a reason for dropping it?
nope... just that the cop
Submitted by dtail on
nope... just that the cop himself voided it. anyway - i win. ;)
That's Cool
Submitted by gyrospanner on
I wish I could get a break lke that for my tickets!
Cheers
GYRO