This review is for the north seciton of the 10 St bike lanes, north of 23 Ave NW. For comments and concerns with the south portion, see http://bikecalgary.org/node/3423
Do you use these 10 St lanes? Do you agree with the assesment below? Are there other good or bad aspects about the lanes? Have you had a good experience? A bad experience? How could things be improved?
1. Area under review
2. Infrastructure
The roadway is two lanes with a speed limit of 50 kph. On street parking is permitted from Rosedale Dr NW to Northmount Dr.
There are painted bike lanes on both sides of the road.
Calgary Transit routes 4 (northbound) and 5 (southbound) have frequent runs along the route.
This is part of the North Hill Bicycle Improvements project. http://www.calgary.ca/Transportation/TP/Pages/Cycling/Cycling-Route-Improvements/North-Hill-Bicycle-Improvements.aspx
3. Importance/Connectivity
The route provides direct connections to the neighbourhoods of Mt. Pleasant, Cambrian Heights, Capital Hill, and Rosemont. Onward connection to Collingwood, Charleswood and Brentwood. There is the potential to connect to Dalhousie and points northwest via future bike route on Northmount to planned bike lanes on Northland Drive.
All are Ward 07 communities and have the highest (by Ward) bicycle transportation mode share in the City (2.6-3.0%) as per the 2011 City Civic Census.
This section of the route provides a vital connection to the 10 St NW lanes south of 23 Ave NW.
4. Safety Concerns
4.1 Southbound Lane Initiation
Initiates abruptly at Northmount Dr NW. There is reasonably easy access from Northmount drive northwest of 14th Street NW.
Preference would be to have a clearly marked and painted bike lane initiate prior to 14th Street NW (perhaps near Carol Drive NW) to allow safe southbound travel through the 14th Street NW and Northmount Drive NW
intersections. This would extend the utility of the lanes to cyclists coming from and going to the west side of 14 ST NW.
4.2 Northbound Lane Termination
The lane terminates abruptly at Northmount Drive. This is probably the most hazardous part of the entire route as the termination of the lane forces northgoing bicyclists to try and squeeze along the curb in the midst of two major intersections, one with high volumes of traffic attempting to cross the bicyclists path (i.e. NB Northmount Drive to NB 14th Street NW).
Solutions could include:
-
an advanced green for bicyclists to allow them to cross past the merge lane prior to motor vehicle traffic (would benefit bicyclists starting from a red but offer little benefit if northgoing traffic already has a green);
-
a bike box in the right lane that allows bicyclists to move to the front of motor vehicles (same benefit and constraint as previous) or;
-
a through bicycle lane to convey bicyclists through the Northmount Drive/10th Street NW and Northmount Drive/14th Street NW intersections (would require application of high-visibility paint and signage indicating right-turning vehicles must yield to bicycles/watch for bicycles). This option would seem to offer the safest and most efficient means for throughgoing bicyclists.
The proposed extension of the bike lane onto the traffic island and then to a pathway along the north side of Northmount Drive (between Northmount Drive and 14th Street) is not recommended as a solution (
http://www.calgary.ca/Transportation/TP/Documents/cycling/Cycling-Route-Improvements/10-St-key-plan-and-sections.pdf plan Location A). This would significantly inconvenience throughgoing bicyclists by forcing them to cross as pedestrians at 14th Street NW and then forcing them to somehow rejoin Northmount Drive beyond the 14th Street NW intersection.
4.3 The "Door Zone"
Where on-street parking is permitted, concerns have been expressed that insufficient space is provided between the bicycle lanes and parking lanes to protect bicyclists from the door zone.
Recognizing that there is limited roadway space on this section it is recommended that one parking lane be removed. Observation would suggest limited use of the northbound parking lane relative to the southbound parking lane. Removal of this parking lane would allow for additional space to provide a buffer between the southbound bicycle lanes and the parked vehicles.
An alternative suggestion would be to attain more road space by setting back the curbs however reallocation of parking space would seem to be the cheaper alternative.
4.4 Bus Stops and Other Areas Shared with Motorists
Additional lane demarcation - It has been suggested that additional signage, markings and solid paint be included where the bike lane is displaced from the curb lane, particularly near bus stops. This would remind both cyclists and motorists that the space is shared and extra caution is warranted.
5. Security Concerns
There have been only a few reports of motorists parking in the bike lanes. But where parking is permitted and the bike lane is immediately adjacent to the parking area there are problems. Motorists do not always pull next to the curb or wider vehicles park there putting the door or parts of the vehicle into the bike lane. This problem gets worse in the winter when snow and ice piles up next to the curb. Perhaps some kind of pavement marking would help here.




worth noting?
Submitted by mikewarren on
In the "infrastructure" section that the as-planned North Hill improvements didn't actually include bike lanes anywhere south of Confederation...?
14 st north
Submitted by relic beachcomber on
I always feel somewhat exposed on the northbound section of 14st after the intersection with Northmount. I continue north on 14st to pick up the bike path near the Winterclub, and the on-road section can be a bit sketchy as I'm making my way up the hill.
14 st north
Submitted by relic beachcomber on
I always feel somewhat exposed on the northbound section of 14st after the intersection with Northmount. I continue north on 14st to pick up the bike path near the Winterclub, and the on-road section can be a bit sketchy as I'm making my way up the hill.
That is an unfortunate gap in
Submitted by amf673 on
That is an unfortunate gap in the infrastructure. The pathway along 14th/Nose Hill goes a long way and it would be great to be able to connect to it and riding on 14th St is almost always a sketchy proposition.
10th St. NW Bike Lanes
Submitted by asiawalker on
As someone who has never dared bike to work before, it was the addition of the bike lanes in the NW inspired me to give it a shot at the beginning of May. I am now biking to work daily and enjoy every minute of my commute. The bike lanes have their issues, but I am fortunate enough to live just east of 14th St. and one block south of Northmount, so I don't encounter the 14th St. issues. I see more and more bikers in the lanes daily, and I think that they are a huge step towards making Calgary more cycle-friendly. Keep them!
Yeah! That is great, and
Submitted by amf673 on
Yeah! That is great, and exactly the type of feedback we want to hear. We may have to put you on a poster or something
I know you kid, but that is a
Submitted by Richard Z on
I know you kid, but that is a seriously good idea.
Poster!
Submitted by asiawalker on
That would be so awesome! I would totally be in a poster, in all my silly large-helmeted non-biking-jersy-clothed glory
I totally love this idea and
Submitted by Julie Gregg on
I totally love this idea and asiawalker is agreeable so I say go for it!
Ditto!
Submitted by fixmtl on
Ditto!
Door zone NB
Submitted by snowandscience on
Totally agree with NB door zone - it's downhill, I pick up significant speed there and doors could do a lot more damage than when I'm heading SB in the uphill direction, usually at a much slower speed... maybe make the NB side parking-free and converting SB side to angle parking (lose fewer parking spots this way, eliminate door zone completely) might be a solution? I know that space is really busy on weekends w/confed park right there.
I haven't done the Northmount/14th St intersection frequently, but something about it is very uncomfortable. I think you've captured it in the description though.
@asiawalker - awesome and congrats!!
NB from Northmount Dr. to 14th Street
Submitted by KimKelln on
This section is tricky but I've found that I can navigate safely even in heavier traffic. I keep to the far right and look for an opening to sneak over to the through lane as I cross 14th. I'm not that fast so I usually hit the red at 14th anyway which slows traffic and gives me some riding room. If traffic is too heavy, and the light is green (only happened a couple of times) I'll either cross 14th on the cross-walk, or wait until it's red, then walk to position myself in the through lane. I'm not sure what can be done there to make it smoother for either cyclists or drivers. More signage to tell drivers to watch for merging cyclists might help.
In the summer I don't take that section. I'll use 10th Street via 20th avenue instead. 20th and my connector street are tough to navigate in the winter, though, so I'll use Northmount to 10th
Bike Box at Northmount, Door Zone
Submitted by psysal on
These bike lanes are awesome, I use them almost every day on my way to and from work.
A bike box is desperately needed at the intersection of Cambrian Dr. and Northmount, however.
This is a significant safety issue as there is essentially cross traffic where the bike lane terminates; Cyclists typically want to cross left, and motorists want to cross right. It would be perfectly resolved with a bike box. There probably needs to be signage for both cyclists and motorists; for cyclists, ideally paint lane markings on the second-from-right-hand through lane lane, between Cambrian Dr. and 14th street. Less experienced cyclists will intuitively want to be in or close to the right-hand turning lane which is not the best place to be. For motorists you likely just need a sign indicating not to advance into the bike box, at least when it's first painted. My hunch is that motorists will see the lane markings for cyclists and understand, as well.
The door zone is also an issue.
I am confused as to why folks are saying it's the NW-bound door zone that is the problem. In my mind it's the SE-bound door zone that is bigger issue, i.e. heading into downtown, from after cambrian drive all the way to confederation park. Unfortunately this is the most used side of the street for parking.
The grade is definitely uphill away from downtown from confederation park to 14th street, and with fewer cars here I don't generally find much to be worried about with respect to parked cars. There are also fewer side streets and visibility is better.
On the other hand, SE-bound there are two side streets here that are dangerous for cyclists in terms of visibility (speaking from personal experience) and where the road curves to the right, just before confederation park, I generally always pull into the vehicle lane as visibility is too poor to safely travel very fast in the bike lane, there.
A compromise might be to remove street parking just for this stretch that starts to bend to the right. As well, some signage for motorists entering from the two side streets to watch for cyclists might be very worthwhile. For instance: "Crossing Bicycle Lane Watch for cyclists" with a diagram.
Removing the street parking entirely between 14th street and confederation park is the ideal solution for cyclists but I can definitely see the position of people who live along this street who may not have anywhere to park their cars, and would hate to invite backlash.
Alternately, it might be possible to remove street parking on both sides, for this entire stretch, and have enough room for 3 full vehicle lanes as well as 2 bike lanes. This might actually be the best solution all-around and serve the largest segment of the public, both motorist and cyclist, best.
actual infrastructure is sidewalk...
Submitted by mikewarren on
...what you're "supposed" to do there, I believe, is take to the sidewalk on the north side, which is now magically a MUP between the turn in Northmount and 14th street...
Putting cars and bikes on the same busy road will never be safe
Submitted by jamesc.hall on
I still think it's a big mistake to put cars and bikes together on the same busy road. Let's face it, there's still a ton more cars than bikes. The main arteries should be for cars and trucks and busses and exhaust fumes. There's always going to be big issues trying to blend bikes that are vulnerable and travel at different speeds with rush hour traffic. Car doors, bus stops, snow removal, frustrated motorists are problems that aren't going to go away. What we need are designated bike routes that are NOT on the main roads. 10th street is not a direct route for me, but 19th street is. Why go to all that trouble to try to integrate bikes on 19th street, when you can instead take the Memorial pedestrian overpass at 21st and wind up through Briar Hill and use the overpass over 16th Ave. Or use 18th street. These are far better options for cyclists than squeezing us on to 19th street. There must be similar routes that could be developed on either side of 10th street that could be really bike friendly. Most bike paths are kept clear of snow in the winter than the roads are and are much safer. Think outside the box. Help get the cyclists off the main roads - better for us and better for the motorists.
Counterpoint
Submitted by bclark on
Main arteries ( i.e. 10th Street, 19th Street, etc.) provide direct access for cyclists, something that side streets, particularly in the case of 10th street, cannot do. Duplicating the 10th street route via sidestreets and pathways was suggested during the original debate. The Crescent Heights escarpment, 16th Avenue and Confederation Park all prove to be barriers to direct connectivity between central NW communities and the Centre City. The added complication to using sidestreets is low priority for snow removal in winter, which is also problematic at pathway-roadway junctions. Significant added time or complexity may actually discourage cyclists. 19th street may be a case where an alternative non-main artery bike route would work because it has better connections. The challenge would still be snow removal in winter, i.e. may have to declare a snow route. Likewise the overpass from Briar Hill would have to be replaced because it's a horrible piece of infrastructure for cyclists. The point about exhaust fumes is interesting and goes towards something that should be addressed in a more robust manner, i.e. emission standards, testing and penalties. Safety of cyclists can be protected on busy roads with more robust facilities. Ideally it would be great if we could better leverage our pathway network for efficient cycle travel, though doing so would require a shift in how the pathway ROW's are viewed. Does that address your concerns somewhat?
10 Street Uphill Lane and 5 Ave Bike Box
Submitted by barnecut on
I'm not a regular user of 10 Street, but I do have a couple of observations based on a quick ride down the hill on Sunday. I arrived at 10 Street from 13 Avenue. An older fellow (likely younger than I) road down the wrong side of 13 Ave and onto the the up hill biccycle lane. I would not have appreciated meeting him if I were in the uphill lane. Perhaps the signage is not clear for southbound traffic that the pathway is a shared bicyle/pedestrian pathway. I don't think the gentleman wanted to use a commuter lane, but needed some guidance.
I used the bike box at 5 Ave. I knew it was there from using it last year. I don't recall any signs indicating that it was there or how to use it. Perhaps I was going too fast and missed the sign if there was one.
Rosemont CA is holding a
Submitted by Richard Z on
Rosemont CA is holding a community meeting on the 10 St bike lanes:
http://bikecalgary.org/node/3470
If you ride from Rosemont, please attend, esp if you have suggestions for improving traffic flow.